Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JJ's avatar

So the organization has been able to have a booth for twenty years until just recently, has leadership changed and do you know about the background of the person who made the decision to change their inclusion?

Ted's avatar

I'm of a divided mind about this decision, even though the "no explanation will be provided" part is highly suspicious.

As a matter of sentiment and statute, I think the decision fits a very strongly-signaled pattern of attack on Christian religious expression, specifically.

On the other hand, that pattern of attack includes a rebranding element; we see a rise in "Christian" organization startups that deny Christ and the teachings of His apostles, seeking to dilute and undermine Christianity by any means necessary and possible.

One of those tactics, is demanding equal access with the intention of instigating lawfare.

My point, is that there is more than one plausible explanation for the refusal, but again; more information is required.

No posts

Ready for more?