Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charles Wemyss, Jr.'s avatar

Beyond on the agriculture sector and people just needing water to survive the loss of even one megawatt of renewable hydroelectricity, which on am installed capacity basis is the lowest cost electric power than. An be produced is a disgrace when it is needlessly removed and replaced by high cost and heavily subsidized wind, solar and battery generation. The California Independent System Operator needs to be brought into the picture as well as FERC, the ISO see every second of the day the limited nature of and the larger consequences of the renewable energy grift on the California rate and tax payer who are oddly enough one and same. Secretary Rollins is correct; everyone in the areas that will be impacted by the dam removal and the impact on water rights managed by a few to the detriment of the many, ought to be outraged and up in arms figuretively. The greater good of the 600,000 verses that of 5,000 ought to be clear enough case on its own merits.

Good luck in the fight as it is fight worth fighting. Save yourselves, nobody is coming to save you otherwise.

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

976362

Hauling migrating fish around the dam where they congregate when stopped would be a quick, easy, and very inexpensive solution. Those objecting seem very likely to just be looking to profit from building fish ladders or the destruction of this wonderful resource. Fry going downstream would have a great place to grow up without being stuck in drying pools.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?