Anyone who thinks this attorney for the RV Nation has the Nation’s best interests at heart needs to have a sanity check. He is paid thug, why this writer can’t figure out is why the RV nation is taking his blankets filled with smallpox. In the end 5-10-15-20 years from now the RV will have no comtrol over the watershed and they will be broke as broke can be, further they will be isolated and reviled for this insult to 600,000 local population. This movie is in editing rework because we have seen it so many times. Keep the fight going and look for every bad actor to show up and support dam removal. Just fight them until they relent.
Fascinating deployment of behavioral science, using a conditioned stimulus invoked by a "trigger word."
That trigger word is "misinformation."
The conditioned response is a powerful one. When triggered, it shuts down certain ordinary cognitive processes by means of inducing cognitive dissonance in the affected subjects.
It's really quite interesting to observe. The mechanism of action operates within the right frontal lobe of the brain, mimicking the effect of certain types of lesions that interfere with the ability to reason.
The conditioning process has been well-documented in the literature. The effects are reproducible across a wide variety of test subjects. We see the efficacy; test subjects willingly refuse food and water when the conditioning has been invoked.
The sample size of the test, roughly 600,000 subjects, helps to present a compelling body of evidence that Stoddard's experimental work on frequency of reinforcement in the early nineteen-eighties, used sound methodology.
It seems reasonable to posit that Ms. Covelo's publication threatened an inducement of desistance to the conditioning, within the selected population of affected test subjects. We shall see if the noted frequency of reinforcement serves as further validation of Stoddard's experimental results.
We can hypothesize that the relatively lower efficacy of the conditioned response among rural test subjects, may be attributed to a lower frequency of exposure to the conditioning.
Clearly the geniuses at ERPA never learned the old adage - “Don’t pick fights with those you buy ink by the barrel!”
And these days you don’t even need to buy the ink!
Great job Keely destroying their poorly thought out smear attempt!
Now more people than ever can clearly see that the truth is on the side of those fighting to keep our dams and water, and that the cabal calling themselves ERPA are a bunch of lowlife liars!
That they felt a need to respond should validate the fact that you are, as they say, hitting close to the target.
Anyone who thinks this attorney for the RV Nation has the Nation’s best interests at heart needs to have a sanity check. He is paid thug, why this writer can’t figure out is why the RV nation is taking his blankets filled with smallpox. In the end 5-10-15-20 years from now the RV will have no comtrol over the watershed and they will be broke as broke can be, further they will be isolated and reviled for this insult to 600,000 local population. This movie is in editing rework because we have seen it so many times. Keep the fight going and look for every bad actor to show up and support dam removal. Just fight them until they relent.
The facts are out there, obviously those defending themselves tells the whole story …. A little bit of truth goes a long ways …
Fascinating deployment of behavioral science, using a conditioned stimulus invoked by a "trigger word."
That trigger word is "misinformation."
The conditioned response is a powerful one. When triggered, it shuts down certain ordinary cognitive processes by means of inducing cognitive dissonance in the affected subjects.
It's really quite interesting to observe. The mechanism of action operates within the right frontal lobe of the brain, mimicking the effect of certain types of lesions that interfere with the ability to reason.
The conditioning process has been well-documented in the literature. The effects are reproducible across a wide variety of test subjects. We see the efficacy; test subjects willingly refuse food and water when the conditioning has been invoked.
The sample size of the test, roughly 600,000 subjects, helps to present a compelling body of evidence that Stoddard's experimental work on frequency of reinforcement in the early nineteen-eighties, used sound methodology.
It seems reasonable to posit that Ms. Covelo's publication threatened an inducement of desistance to the conditioning, within the selected population of affected test subjects. We shall see if the noted frequency of reinforcement serves as further validation of Stoddard's experimental results.
We can hypothesize that the relatively lower efficacy of the conditioned response among rural test subjects, may be attributed to a lower frequency of exposure to the conditioning.
Clearly the geniuses at ERPA never learned the old adage - “Don’t pick fights with those you buy ink by the barrel!”
And these days you don’t even need to buy the ink!
Great job Keely destroying their poorly thought out smear attempt!
Now more people than ever can clearly see that the truth is on the side of those fighting to keep our dams and water, and that the cabal calling themselves ERPA are a bunch of lowlife liars!